Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

SVB execs were way too risky with their investments...way too much money in “AFS” (available for sale) bonds and not enough in “held-to-maturity” (HTM) bond assets. Other more responsible banks shifted their bond portfolio to heavy on HTM. Plus they held far too little in cash reserves (”fractional reserve banking” come home to roost again like 2008). The new Fed bank reserve requirements are now 0, zip, nada (used to be 10%). We need to go the other way on reserve requirements...a “full reserve bank” might be popular!

Backstopping banks like this just encourages future bad behavior/dangerous risk taking -—>”moral hazard”.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/13/svb-collapse-silicon-valleys-greed-and-avarice-to-blame-trader-says.html

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4137677/posts

https://news.bitcoin.com/silicon-valley-bank-failure-highlights-dangers-of-fractional-reserve-banking/

https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/reservereq.htm


82 posted on 03/13/2023 8:26:34 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Drago
We need to go the other way on reserve requirements...a “full reserve bank” might be popular!

Sounds like a real money maker.

83 posted on 03/13/2023 9:07:04 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson