Superb thesis by Q, absolutely. As far as it goes.
( Apologies, first. It’s possible I suffer from amplified critical thinking, which I have always called my “glass-half-empty” type, so there’s that.) 🤪
I trip up on questions concerning the stratispheric setting of the Q bar, for ever pulling the trigger, if there is a Q bar, for ever actually launching a flame throwing MIL intervention. (Okay, being facetious there. No “flame throwing”. 😚)
The ideas & the references Q posited; to “show the “public”; about the DOD Law of War Manual; about the War Powers Act of the 70’s; about the domestic and foreign MIL applications of these unexact definitions are running out of runway.
If MIL actions are so clandestine and covert that they are not manifested, but seeming endless, do they in practice really exist?
Concerning the domestic theater, regarding the SHOW Time and the popcorn, it is reasonable to wonder how many showings are calculated, how many calendar years for the show bills to hang, and how devastating the consequences of all the SHOW-ings, all which are effectively becoming increasingly a world danger, and emanating out of the USA Regime, without consequence.
Not all “means to an end” are justifiable.
Even when intended for a “Good” end, not all means are justifiable. Thing of The Hypocratic Oath, for example— a preferable means to “Do no harm” along the way in practicing the healing arts.
Methinks that for the US Regime, by proxy, to bring the world to the brink of “war and Rumors of war” [world war] in order to “show the public” that Democrats are practically a terrorist organization. I have my issue with proxy wars, ala UKR, underwriten by captured American tax payers.
I learned that from Q.
I’m not derisive of Q’s Socratic method for ripping the veil from US actions, in its war profiteering for self-advantage, but at the expense of lesser advantaged nations and their sovereignty and losses of life.
I think, that in using the occasional name of “Good”, and also of GOD, that the ongoing lack of MIL address is shameful, and beginning to rather dare God, or beginning to approach testing God.
The Q words... “will to change” is a little elusive, by its inclusiveness.
The phrase is left without distinction. This phrase can mean for use when speaking politically, practically, Militarily, domestically, globally. But, which is it? When is it One, or is it All? It kinda matters to our formation of conclusions, I think, concerning smoke and mirrors or for understanding,
clarity.
We each decide and define and decipher certainty, individually. No one is certain because there is no clarity or certainty around words. Apparently, hopium can result, but that really is not a convincing strategy for public keyboard debates, nor for MIL action.
Christians, generally, might agree that the “will to change” is always entirely left to the heart of man, and its response to God.
Q covers that, too...
“GOD Wins”.
Back to the Q MIL, Law of War, War Powers Act, and that high bar for intervention. Something is not quite Qlicking.
“Only the MIL” (ie., implied intervention) VS Multiple Institutional & ongoing COUPS against POTUS 45, the ongoing destruction of the West and setting the world on fire.
Might the Scare Event be the absence of Q intervening, at all?
If we’re going to point to progress, I’m unsure that the result is owing to MIL. More actionable *intervention* lay in the unflappable, James Comer, & in the very flappable, Jim Jordan.🤪
3.10.23: From J6 to Twitter, this week will go down in HISTORY, EXPOSED! PRAY!
.
My brother gleaned from Restored Republic that the Supreme Court was visited this week by members of the military who warned them they would be charged with misprision of a felony if they failed to take on the Brunson case. Restored Republic doesn't have the greatest track record, but I'm still encouraged.