~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I respectfully disagree. Tucker is trying as hard as he can to expose all--even including C_A/FBI as "Handler" or more in JFK and Watergate. It would be a bad strategic move for all of us if he gave up his Fox News platform. We just have to understand he is giving only what he is allowed while keeping his job.
Here is what Matt Taibbi said in his written statement to Congress (today?): Effectively, news media became an arm of a state-sponsored thought-policing system. Some will say, “So what? Why shouldn’t we eliminate disinformation?” To begin with, you can’t have a state-sponsored system targeting “disinformation” without striking at the essence of the right to free speech. The two ideas are in direct conflict. Many of the fears driving what my colleague Michael Shellenberger calls the “Censorship-Industrial Complex” also inspired the infamous “Alien and Sedition Laws of 1798.” The latter outlawed “any false, scandalous, and malicious writing against Congress or the president.”
They don't like the First Amendment.
They (the Deep State/Media Complex) now have a problem with one network (FOX) getting an "exclusive" when the Fake Media would sell their mothers into slavery to get an exclusive story themselves. Hypocrisy!
Agreed and well said.