The problem with nuclear power is that it’s pollution-free, which means the Left will have nothing to cry about. They’re always quick to point out the dangers and the nuclear waste, which are far easier to deal with than the supposed threat of CO2, but that doesn’t seem to matter. Funny that for all their predictions of doom, they’re unwilling to accept any viable energy alternatives.
If the antinuke unscientific idiots of the seventies hadn’t prevailed in halting development we would be much better off. “Party of science” /s
It is deliberate that they are not willing to accept any viable alternatives. It’s not a war on “pollution”..... it’s a means of controlling and suppressing human activity.
There are some reasons for optimism.... look at France. The only nation that is meeting their “climate goals” and they are doing it through nuclear power. It will be interesting to see if Germany follows in their footsteps because the German economy requires cheap and plentiful electricity.
I wish that Trump would announce a nuclear renaissance for the United States if he were elected with a focus on new and improved nuclear power plants. He could even “sell” it by talking about how “clean” it is in comparison to other sources.
Every single time I have a logic-driven discussion with a liberal, about energy needs, it always, and I mean ALWAYS, ends up with them saying that root of the problem is too many people. So then I ask them which ones should be killed. They can’t answer that.