Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux
These are very old reports, but both have been corroborated by many other retired service members. The importance of this reporting to the AARO is that the Intel Committees can now hold the DOD responsible for being aware of these reports.

When Under SecDef for Intel and Security Ronald Moultrie and Scott W. Bray, Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence, appeared before the House Intel Committee, both denied any awareness of this famous matter. They are no longer unaware.

2 posted on 02/24/2023 3:32:48 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RoosterRedux

I’ll just say from the 1978 to 1980 period...there are more of these at the nuke sites. Most AF members tried to report and were persuaded that it was ‘unreportable’.


6 posted on 02/24/2023 3:52:14 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Hey Rooster—these two gentlemen noted in the article have written a book that is excellent:

https://www.amazon.com/Confession-Hidden-Alien-Encounters-Revealed/dp/1695688856

They are contactees and in this book they walk through the details of both the military incidents and their personal “incidents”.


I am interested in your thoughts on another UAP topic.

Many of the “smart folks in the room” like Exoacademian are convinced that at least some of what is happening is time travel from the future—and the attempts of some aliens to “change” our present to “change” their future.

I am having a hard time with the theory of the concept. The conventional explanation that allows this to happen is the
“block universe” theory which basically says the future has already happened and is “frozen”.

Since aliens from the future would have already experienced part of that future that contradicts the notion of time travel that changes the future—it would apparently make it impossible.

One theory that would make changing the future possible is the quantum version of time travel which says the past and present cannot be changed but the future has infinite possibilities.

This approach drifts into crazy time loop scenarios as well and/or the creation of multiple universes which mean that “changing the future” just would cast the aliens into either nutty time loops or futures which were so different from their future that they would not know anybody.

Bottom line—none of these time travel theories are persuasive to me at all—I do not see how “changing the future” time travel makes operational sense.


8 posted on 02/24/2023 3:55:23 AM PST by cgbg (Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Hey Rooster—these two gentlemen noted in the article have written a book that is excellent:

https://www.amazon.com/Confession-Hidden-Alien-Encounters-Revealed/dp/1695688856

They are contactees and in this book they walk through the details of both the military incidents and their personal “incidents”.


I am interested in your thoughts on another UAP topic.

Many of the “smart folks in the room” like Exoacademian are convinced that at least some of what is happening is time travel from the future—and the attempts of some aliens to “change” our present to “change” their future.

I am having a hard time with the theory of the concept. The conventional explanation that allows this to happen is the
“block universe” theory which basically says the future has already happened and is “frozen”.

Since aliens from the future would have already experienced part of that future that contradicts the notion of time travel that changes the future—it would apparently make it impossible.

One theory that would make changing the future possible is the quantum version of time travel which says the past and present cannot be changed but the future has infinite possibilities.

This approach drifts into crazy time loop scenarios as well and/or the creation of multiple universes which mean that “changing the future” just would cast the aliens into either nutty time loops or futures which were so different from their future that they would not know anybody.

Bottom line—none of these time travel theories are persuasive to me at all—I do not see how “changing the future” time travel makes operational sense.


9 posted on 02/24/2023 3:55:24 AM PST by cgbg (Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson