Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob Ireland; Steve Van Doorn

Christopher Dunn, in his last book, analyzed the heck out of an available core sample: pitch, depth, etc. of cuts. But no one has been able to replicate the power required and hardness of the cutter point that it would have taken to produce those slugs. Even in my own shop, which can make most anything, it would take awhile to build a setup that could knarf granite like that. I’m forever fascinated by the question of where the Egypts took/hid their tools?


2,264 posted on 03/06/2023 11:45:26 AM PST by OldWarBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2193 | View Replies ]


To: OldWarBaby
***I’m forever fascinated by the question of where the Egypts took/hid their tools?***

As are we all. As I implied, Flinders Petrie displays inexplicable stone artifacts at his museum, yet they never get any mention. Why? Because to associate Petrie with ideas considered 'marginal' by the cognoscenti might taint their whole field of study... in their view.

I searched for a while to locate a stone artifact with tell tale 'grooves' left by machining.

I have one or two of Christopher Dunn's books. His irrefutable evidence can only earn him condemnation by the same above. I suppose that it is always possible that the actual evidence of advanced stone shaping technology is being suppressed. If Egyptian Antiquities authority Zahi Hawass has any say about it - yes, it likely is. ¯\_🙄_/¯

2,266 posted on 03/06/2023 12:02:56 PM PST by Bob Ireland (The Democrap Party is the enemy of freedom.They use all the seductions and deceits of the Bolshevics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2264 | View Replies ]

To: OldWarBaby
Most of them took their tools and left. They will be back on earth around Sagittarius (+4000 years) and then again around Leo of the great year by my estimations. based on Sirius being binary.

Lloyd Pye had the right general idea. Which he took what was said by the Sumerian and what we know today and combine them. Though he was mistaken on geological dates a few other points.
Here he shows a copy of a scull found of Homo Capensis.
A 3% difference in cranial capacity on average gives about 10 point IQ change in humans. These are about 1/3 larger then humans. (yes, the standard model of science would disagree with me)
This would mean on average their IQ should be +130 assuming the composition is similar ours. On average ours is around 100.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_AAYjoJsBM
Longer interview here:
https://youtu.be/gy72sPtBAJg
2,269 posted on 03/07/2023 2:06:43 AM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2264 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson