The statement from the Trump spokesperson is a good one, but I don’t think PDJT has ever really been in jeopardy because of the combination of his Presidential immunity from civil prosecution and the Brady Doctrine, which applies to criminal cases. The Brady decision requires that the prosecution turn over all exculpatory evidence to the defendant in a criminal case and, as we know, exculpatory evidence is evidence that might exonerate the defendant, such as ALL of the J6 videos, his speeches, his and their correspondence, etc. Neither avenue would be successful for the DOJ, so why do they keep pursuing this?
If their point is merely to sully his name and prevent another nomination, that doesn’t seem to be working either. As more information drips out at a digestible pace, President Trump is more and more exonerated in the public eye. Even Dems are now saying “Enough!” (going after this guy). I’m beginning to wonder if that’s been the whole point of continuing the witch hunt - threaten and investigate while the public sees evidence of exoneration dripping out from a variety of non-DOJ sources. That strongly suggests that WH are in control.
Think logically.
How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)?
Who has everything?
Methods which info collected/ obtained?
Admissible in the court of law?
Insert Rudy.