That is correct - but I'm not reading that individual article in isolation like it exists in its own stand alone universe - I'm reading it in the context of all of the comments the conspiracy theorists have made as well as his own writings including this one.
That analysis fails. You can’t incorrectly try to create a correlation that McCullough didn’t make, then try to discredit him based on your phantom correlation. He simply cited the dangers of a non-mRNA covid vaccine, nothing more.