She’s echoing the message of the party which is time for a new generation to lead rather than the likes of Joe, Pelosi, Schumer, et al who have steered this nation for decades.
The ballot box IS the term limit. I oppose term limits based on my experience in California where our reform of term limits meant the perpetual lobbyists, union bosses and deep state run things. Democrats knew what they were doing with “reforms” in California over the years. Nineties term limits ensured a churn that pushed out of Republican faces, top two reform in the 2010s keeps Republicans out of the general elections. The only trick missing is “rank choice voting” but they don’t need it since California is indisputably blue across the state.
They have destroyed the Republican brand in California by never missing a beat to attack the party no matter how distant and irrelevant Republicans are from the problems in California. It’s never the Dems fault.
Jus soli is not enough.
A natural born citizen is one born on US soil to two US citizen parents.
Supreme Court precedent
In Minor v. Happersett (1874), all children born in the United States were divided into two categories: those whose parents were U.S. citizens, and
those whose parents were not. The Court used the term “natural born citizen” only in reference to members of the first category. The Court doubted
whether members of the second category were even citizens, let alone natural born citizens [22]:
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At
common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in
a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born
citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the
jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. (Minor
v. Happersett, 1874).
Since a child acquires “natural born citizen” status only at birth [07], and since the Supreme Court (in Minor v. Happersett) “distinguished” natural
born citizens from aliens or foreigners, it follows that natural born citizens are persons who, when born, are not aliens or foreigners, i.e., are neither foreign-born nor foreign citizens/subjects.