Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SecAmndmt

200 years of immunology disagrees with you. If you want to be an antivaxxer more power to you.
But I am glad you have admitted to being snticaxxer. Finally some honesty.


97 posted on 02/21/2023 5:46:27 PM PST by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: gas_dr

Nice to be labeled. Oh well.

I am a pro-sciencer. Chem eng with graduate degree working in modeling and statistics ~30 yrs. There is no “evidence” behind the majority of vaccines. Just lots of dishonesty and fraud. Do you seriously want to hitch your wagon to that? I am sure your clinical skills are just fine. The belief in vaccines is quasi-religious, not scientific. Lol. I will invite you to read the book. Be brave.

As to “antivaxxer”, the label itself is unscientific and quasi-religious. I bet you cannot even provide a scientific definition of the label. You label yourself as a Statist, a leftist and the domestic Enemy of freedom and liberty.

Still waiting for you to answer any of the very simple questions I have asked you recently.


100 posted on 02/21/2023 8:22:48 PM PST by SecAmndmt (Cv19 vaccines are Phase 2 of the CCP bioweapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson