“Accepting the mRNA treatment as a condition of hiring and employment is still policy for way too many employers, particularly in the healthcare field.
Such conditions must be prohibited by law.”
You’ve got it backwards. The healthcare worker mandate is not imposed by employers. It is REQUIRED by law (or by regulation with the force of law).
There is a problem right there. "Administrative regulations" are not a legitimate method of enacting laws.
I have found no "law" that can require people to take the mRNA treatment for any reason. It is still classified as an experimental procedure. Supposedly, treatment is voluntary after informed consent.
To be sure, nobody really understands the law any longer. It is quite possible that you may find an obscure provision tucked away which is a black letter requirement for the jab in specified people.
If you find such law, let's get it repealed right now.
We all know, of course that what we have is a pretense of law. People have been duped into accepting the treatment with no informed consent and information showing hazards has been vigorously suppressed. The original clinical research was contaminated by fraud and selective elimination of adverse data.
Millions of people were frankly coerced into the treatment by threats of firing if they did not accept it. Most people complied. Enough people did not such that employers had to reconsider those policies. That sorting out is underway now.
None of this is legitimate.