Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: taxcontrol

Gets tricky. If the government ordered it, the fraud is on the government. But colluding with fraud even under orders may not be protected. Since Nuremberg (and actually well before but that’s a reference most people know about), “I was acting under orders” is not a valid defense.


7 posted on 02/18/2023 8:03:07 AM PST by piytar (Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: piytar

piytar wrote: “Since Nuremberg (and actually well before but that’s a reference most people know about), “I was acting under orders” is not a valid defense.”

Nuremburg has never been incorporated into US law, either by statute or treaty. Any attempt to incorporate now would run into Ex Post Facto.


22 posted on 02/18/2023 8:16:24 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: piytar

You can be 100% certain that the supposed “precedents” created by the Nuremberg show trial will NEVER be enforced, or even accepted as binding, upon any government which had a hand in creating the International Military Tribunal.


74 posted on 02/18/2023 9:28:27 AM PST by Jim Noble (You have sat too long for any good you have been doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson