Interesting but this won't stand the legal appeals, imo.
1 posted on
02/17/2023 6:32:26 AM PST by
deport
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: deport
48 posted on
02/17/2023 8:58:36 AM PST by
toddausauras
(Trump Lake 2024....Go down swinging!)
To: deport
They can always go back to China....
49 posted on
02/17/2023 9:17:33 AM PST by
lgjhn23
("On the 8th day, Satan created the progressive liberal to destroy all the good that God created...")
To: deport
The biggest problem I see is that you don’t need to own land next to a military base in order to plant surveillance devices on it. I suppose owning it might make it easier to keep them secret, but not much.
I suspect that what they are trying to do is identify individuals who know secrets so they can spy on them and learn what they know. They probably monitor their social media accounts hoping they will say stuff. They may even recruit them as spies.
To: deport
Tough Chit.
Go back to California and buy there. You can HAVE that state.
53 posted on
02/17/2023 11:58:48 AM PST by
military cop
(I carry a .45....cause they don't make a .46....)
To: deport
Why not? States can regulate who buys property within that state. It’s not a federal issue at all.
Can you own property in Mexico as a US citizen? No. How about China? No. Japan? Germany?
54 posted on
02/17/2023 12:49:06 PM PST by
ro_dreaming
(Who knew "Idiocracy", "1984", "Enemy of the State", and "Person of Interest" would be non-fiction?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson