Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote
Still running interference for the unneeded, toxic ‘vaccine’ I see. You say the Covid ‘vaccines’ still have ‘issues’? You mean perhaps, the fact that they serve no purpose and kill more people than Covid ever did or will? No, you’d never admit that. You’d say something convoluted to cloud the issue.

Well, we're making progress. At least you stopped mentioning the false claim about NIH and ivermectin once you got busted for that.

53 posted on 02/13/2023 9:14:07 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Fury

'Busted' for knowing the NIH deemed Ivermectin an option for use in Covid-19 for 2 years?

When I saw the news about the NIH 'adding Ivermectin' I thought people were finally realizing that Ivermectin was on the approved list all this time even though the NIH/CDC punished/threatened/prohibited pharmacists from actually filling prescriptions. But nah, the latest NIH move you're so proud of is to protect the EUA on the 'vaccines'.

My conscience remains clear. I've warned people to avoid the 'vaccine' and shared safe and effective alternatives (Zelensky  Protocol, McCullough Protocol, FLCC protocol etc.) You don't have a conscience so it's almost like it's clear or something, because you're still proudly running interference for the 'vaccine'. Just think if you were a patriot, the things you could do for the public. But nah, that's not you.


56 posted on 02/13/2023 10:33:11 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson