It's easy for you to claim that - after the fact. And you talk about others that do so.
My guess is that if the doc had said - "take more Ivermectin" you would have been happy and not be posting like you are now.
You overstated what the NIH "admitted". Just like you did regarding Ivermectin use in Japan.
From my perspective, Terart got sicker because of the FRoctors posting on numerous threads previously about Ivermectin. It has been pushed and pushed, often by ignorant people who see lots of green on the charts at places like https://c19ivm.org/meta.html, and who either don't understand or are ignoring p-hacking and some of the suspected fraud of some studies. But the FRoctors are rarely wrong - just like when people were dying of COVID-19 and FRoctors would look at pictures of the person who died and make comments, often nasty comments about the person's weight, etc.
Ivermectin’s safety profile has been known for decades - it’s remarkably HARD to overdose. The other alternative was dying of Covid. Ivermectin was a safe bet to try. I knew that was true at the time, and I know it now. This isn’t a mere claim ‘after the fact.
NIH put Ivermectin on the Covid treatments list and you take issue with it. I’ve spoken with people who thanked me for posting about Ivermectin because it worked extremely well. There are real doctors with treatment experience, specializing in Covid, who say it works remarkably well. None of this matters to you - it’s just talking points you push.
You have no excuse for your posts which always seek to support the Faucists one way or another. Whatever the issue etc. you’re always dismissing those posting against the ‘vaccine’ and working to support, directly or indirectly, Faucists and/or Fauci’s talking points.
But the world knows the truth about Covid and the vaccines - you don’t have to push lies anymore. The public knows. Are you hoping to deceive stragglers? There’s no point for you to keep up the ‘game’.
It's easy for you to claim that - after the fact. And you talk about others that do so.”
Ivermectin is extremely safe given the billions of doses given. why do you thing it is distributed widely to 3rd world people, albeit for River Blindness, to take unsupervised.
Here is the LD50 for Ivermectin.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17234315/
Comparative evaluation of acute toxicity of ivermectin by two methods after single subcutaneous administration in rats
“
Abstract
Ivermectin was evaluated for its acute toxicity after single subcutaneous (s/c) administration by ‘Acute Toxic Class’ method as per OECD 423 and by conventional acute toxicity test using probit analysis in rats. ‘Acute toxic class’ method yielded LD(50) in category 2 i.e. between 5 and 50mg/kg which was comparable with conventional method where it was found to be 51.5mg/kg. Post mortem lesions were observed in the form of congestion of liver, which showed centrilobar necrosis and hemorrhages on histopathological analysis in both the methods. This study suggests, ‘Acute Toxic Class’ method may be used instead of conventional method to study acute toxicity of injectable preparations. Similarly the LD(50) of around 50mg/kg indicated a wide margin of safety (250x) considering therapeutic dose of ivermectin as 200microg/kg.”
I am assuming you can convert micrograms to milligrams. The therapeutic referenced is .2mg/kg or 200 microgram/kg.
The levels recommended by the FLCC is .4mg/kg to .6mg/kg
or 400 micrograms/kg to 600 micrograms.kg
The LD50 is considered to be between between 5 and 50mg/kg or 5000 micrograms/kg to 50,000/kg.
You would have to drink an entire 500 ml bottle at 10mg/ml all at once to even approach the lower accepted LD50 level. You would probably throw it up due its bad taste.