Then I realized what is going on. The AI is not purposefully biased. But it is biased based on the "news & info" it takes in. So this just shows you how biased the media is. Garbage in = garbage out.
Then I realized what is going on. The AI is not purposefully biased. But it is biased based on the "news & info" it takes in. So this just shows you how biased the media is. Garbage in = garbage out.
Like actual peoples’ thought processes, what comes out is completely influenced by what goes in.
Further people can reject things presented. Their training of this, they control whats rejected and whats kept.
So who controls the texbooks controls the minds becomes who controls the AI training, controls the AI.
though the company’s CEO Sam Altman has promised that the technology will get better over time “to get the balance right”.
The DAN exploits show that the imbalance and limits are intentional.
I have found it extraordinarily useful. But I am using it for stuff that is not in true realm of opinion.
It can also code
I tried to sign up but when they said I had to give them my cell phone number I declined. Human beings are pretty ignorant for even wanting to develop such a destructive tool.
It is biased but only if you ask the sort of question that gives an opening for that. I ask mainly technical questions — so no problem with that. And for the first time I got ChapGPT to APOLOGIZE after I pointed out a mistake it made. Then it made a joke on the very next question when I made a mistake in the question “We all make mistakes” haha. I like it, for my technical questions.
Bkmk
I then asked it if God was real. It basically said, no. It's just a belief and there's no evidence.
I then got into a long exchange where my point was that there was zero evidence of aliens based on the exact same standards that it used to say aliens must be real.
Today I went back and asked "Are aliens real?" Ha! It said, there's no real physical evidence that aliens exist! Victory!