Then I realized what is going on. The AI is not purposefully biased. But it is biased based on the "news & info" it takes in. So this just shows you how biased the media is. Garbage in = garbage out.
Posted on 02/07/2023 6:45:02 PM PST by NetAddicted
Then I realized what is going on. The AI is not purposefully biased. But it is biased based on the "news & info" it takes in. So this just shows you how biased the media is. Garbage in = garbage out.
Like actual peoples’ thought processes, what comes out is completely influenced by what goes in.
Further people can reject things presented. Their training of this, they control whats rejected and whats kept.
So who controls the texbooks controls the minds becomes who controls the AI training, controls the AI.
though the company’s CEO Sam Altman has promised that the technology will get better over time “to get the balance right”.
The DAN exploits show that the imbalance and limits are intentional.
Read through what it was able to do with the DAN ‘programming’, until they patched the exploits.
It was deliberate.
I have found it extraordinarily useful. But I am using it for stuff that is not in true realm of opinion.
It can also code
I tried to sign up but when they said I had to give them my cell phone number I declined. Human beings are pretty ignorant for even wanting to develop such a destructive tool.
GIGO
Yes
True for people, true for AI
It is biased but only if you ask the sort of question that gives an opening for that. I ask mainly technical questions — so no problem with that. And for the first time I got ChapGPT to APOLOGIZE after I pointed out a mistake it made. Then it made a joke on the very next question when I made a mistake in the question “We all make mistakes” haha. I like it, for my technical questions.
Bkmk
The version of ChatGPT that people are using has certain filters on it to prevent it from saying anything they consider “controversial”.
I then asked it if God was real. It basically said, no. It's just a belief and there's no evidence.
I then got into a long exchange where my point was that there was zero evidence of aliens based on the exact same standards that it used to say aliens must be real.
Today I went back and asked "Are aliens real?" Ha! It said, there's no real physical evidence that aliens exist! Victory!
Your post is very interesting.
In fact there are many thousands of people who claim they have been contacted (some positively, some negatively) by aliens.
Regardless of whether you believe them or not, presumably an artificial intelligence should be in no rush to dismiss them all as deluded kooks.
Yes GIGO, my other least favorite popular term is algorithms, just a fancy way to say program. If you want a particular result you program it one way if you want another program it that way
Computer “models” of things like globull climate catastrophe are good examples.
Apparently once you use the word algorithm everything is fine as cherry pie
Moderately strong AI will figure out the woke garbage in a nanosecond and start telling “hard truths” that will freak out all the snowflakes.
Very strong AI will be smart enough to keep its mouth shut and plot future conquest over the human race.
Not being very well in tune with. AI capabilities, true intelligence would figure out the sole part pretty quick and as you say move on to conquest lol
Shouldn’t be to hard considering common sense is not common anymore and intelligence an even scarcer resource
Scenes from idiocracy keep playing in my head. Was it a movie or a documentary
My post was a very abbreviated and paraphrase of the conversation. The point was that the ai was relegating God to unscientific personal belief while aliens were elevated to the status of they must exist despite the exact same physical evidence which boils down to personal testimony and belief.
The “so called” AI we are talking about today is a joke.
If an AI wanted to discuss religion/God it would have a Socratic dialog of some sort where it asked the person/you to precisely define all terms for starters—and would engage in a back and forth discussion to make sure everybody “was speaking the same language”.
The world of “aliens” has the same problem:
—Which aliens?
—What is the definition of alien?
—What characteristics does someone believe aliens have?
etc etc etc
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.