Posted on 02/07/2023 8:28:50 AM PST by BenLurkin
The New Horizons vehicle that went to Pluto uses (unironically) a plutonium power source for electricity but not for propulsion.
Are there “people who annoy you” on Mars?
It’s ion drive. There are U.S. companies that have been making them for years. They have higher specific impulse (change in momentum per kilogram of fuel) than chemical rockets, but not enough peak thrust to escape the surly bonds of earth.
And I just happen to be reading Stranger in a Strange Land as we speak!
I know steam turbines make props move on board ships, I’m just having trouble understanding the mechanics of rocket propulsion via nuclear reactor.
The USA built one in the 60’s.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDNX65d-FBY
The key was building a reactor that used ceramics instead of water cooling/moderator.
The plan was to replace the Apollo Service Module with Nerva engine and then fly it to Mars.
Well, there’s always Project Orion.
The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Once again it’s between the US and Brittan as to which engine will be best suited for travel, like in the P-51 Mustang, Allison vs Merlin rolls 61. Just a thought.
Can’t Quick Trip just continue to operate off the grid?
They are used to raise a high voltage, which is then used to accelerate an ionized gas out the thrust nozzle. Heating a gas would also provide for a fast moving reaction mass.
So did most deep space probes like V'ger (Voyager. Sorry, Star Trek reference there.)
Those nuclear batteries were much smaller than what would be necessary for a crewed spacecraft's Ion drive.
I was just reading Wikipedia’s article about them. It would be great to see a successful design actually working on a rocket. It seems like there are a lot of designs, but even a successful one will still have to deal with government bureaucracy and environmentalists.
I hope Elon Musk will get to launch Starship soon.
We’ve already sent rockets to the moon and Mars (and in fact, out of the solar system as well), so I hardly see the point.
It’s the old action reaction concept. Instead of the reactor boiling water in the steam generator to turn a turbine, the reactor is used to heat a gas and expel it through a nozzle. The gas at a given temperature and pressure is heated by passing through or near the core which increases it temperature and pressure. When it is released through the nozzle, it creates thrust from the velocity of its molecules being released.
Looks like you got enough explanations to sink the Bismark. ;-D
Here's a video from Marcus (out of Australia, Tasmania) who follows Space X and other launches on a weekly basis. I watch on YouTube to see what Musk is doing in Boca Chica, Texas and the cape. This is one of his specialty videos about nuclear space propulsion - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLD4DpuGWUA.
Hi.
I don’t have the cajones to be strapped into a capsule sitting on top of six tons of hydrazine and liquid oxygen and let someone light a match.
Maybe if they can figure out nuclear propulsion, I’ll go.
5.56mm
All this science, I don’t understand.
Get a book. ;-D
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.