Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux

“Now, due to new protections for whistleblowers,”

Whistle blowers are people that reveal illegal or immoral behavior.

If you reveal classified military information that is not well understood in violation of your non-disclosure agreement, I think its called something else.

Unless the Gov’t tells/pays you to come forward...


3 posted on 02/07/2023 3:40:37 AM PST by Sarcazmo ("Sarcasm is the highest form of wit" ~ O. Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Sarcazmo
Actually, the protections given to pilots and others do not extend to their violation of NDA's. If classified information is in question, these protections only extend to testifying before Congressional Intel Committees in classified briefings.

As an aside, I didn't invent the usage of "whistleblower" with regard to this matter. Congress did when it referred to the pertinent provisions in the most recent NDAA as "whistleblower" protections.

11 posted on 02/07/2023 4:01:47 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Sarcazmo

Unless the Gov’t tells/pays you to come forward...

~~~

I see a lot of former military and intelligence people give interviews on a lot of these tabloid cable UFO shows, and they talk about how they signed this and that, took oaths, and were sworn to secrecy after certain events, yet here they are, and I don’t trust them at all. Aside from the fact that these shows are basically tabloid trash for TV (I still watch when I’m bored, heh) and present their content as questions and conjecture not as concise documentaries, I can’t figure out how all these witnesses can defy their obligations without consequence, unless of course they are actually meant to be dispensing this (dis)information.


59 posted on 02/07/2023 5:29:04 AM PST by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Sarcazmo

“If you reveal classified military information that is not well understood...”

Is it classified because to reveal it would harm the country? Or because it would harm the careers of someone in the military or government?


77 posted on 02/07/2023 6:21:33 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Sarcazmo

The whistleblower terminology is correct—but you need to understand the UFO/UAP history to understand why.

The best author on this history is Richard Dolan:

https://www.amazon.com/UFOs-National-Security-State-Chronology/dp/1571743170

https://www.amazon.com/UFOs-National-Security-State-1973-1991/dp/0967799511

Short version—there is no clear line of authority to cover-up this stuff. It is a “Deep State” operation—that has intentionally circumvented not just Congress but Presidents as well.

It looks like military contractors have taken over key elements of the coverup—beyond FOIA, beyond civilian or military oversight—with no constitutionally appropriate chain of command.

Whistleblowing is totally appropriate.

Stanton Friedman (famous UFO investigator) called it a “Cosmic Watergate”.


107 posted on 02/07/2023 3:56:27 PM PST by cgbg (Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson