Married in 1977 and she’s 50? She would have been like 5?
“Married in 1977 and she’s 50? She would have been like 5?”
This whole article is completely unclear. Sorry this lady died, but other than that I don’t understand a bit of it.
“ Married in 1977 and she’s 50? She would have been like 5?”
************************************************************
More piss poor writing. They’d been married for 47 years (“almost 50”) so that’s what the writer actually meant to say.
Per the Daily Mail, she was 66: