That is incorrect. There was never a successful mRNA vaccine attempt for the nearly 20 year prior to these, to which you now day there was a problem.
We have no example, ever, of a functioning mRNA vaccine that is safe. Even the current ones are still under an EUA, meaning they were launched and still exist only in the La-La Land territory of something medical without necessary proof of activity, nor safety.
Exactly True !
My, .. how quickly do we forget !
You are correct. All test subjects died when exposed in the wild. The trials never went to Humans.
Since Dr. Malone holds a lot of patents on mRna technology (not the Jab development) Pfizer and Moderna susbstituted Pseudouridine in place of Uridine.
“The long chain polymers composed of four nucleotide bases (ATGC in the case of DNA, AUGC in the case of RNA)
which carry all genetic information (that we know of) across time.” The U is Uridine in RNA in normal mRNA.
“the “mRNA” from the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines which incorporates the synthetic nucleotide pseudouridine can persist in lymph nodes for at least 60 days after injection. This is not natural, and this is not really mRNA.
These molecules have genetic elements similar to those of natural mRNA, but they are clearly far more resistant to the enzymes which normally degrade natural mRNA, seem to be capable of producing high levels of protein for extended periods, and seem to evade normal immunologic mechanisms for eliminating cells which produce foreign proteins which are
not normally observed in the body.”
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/when-is-mrna-not-really-mrna?s=r
Read page 6-7 of the above link for confirmation.
It looks like Pfizer& Moderna side stepped patent obligations in an effort to rush their product to market. $$$$$$$$