Adams still does not understand why the people who refused the vaccine did so. He thinks it was just anti-government rhetoric and refuses to understand that people did their own research and came to informed decisions based upon information that was available and that which was kept hidden from the public.
How long before the ‘snake venom’ conspiracy theorists turn out to be proven correct?
So far we’re batting 1000.
Well said.
Matthew Crawford wrote a Substack piece that showed how he was going after Scott Adams' "logic" from the beginning.
If we dig just a little bit, we'll see that he's not the person he appears to be in a short video clip.
“Adams still does not understand why the people who refused the vaccine did so.”
Because for him to admit that he would have to also admit that he was uncritical and incurious, and that goes against his own self image. Maybe he’ll get there someday, but baby steps...
EXACTLY. It was the media's coordinated anti-hydroxychloroquine stance that was the first clue. Then COMMENTS -- not articles -- on FR had a wealth of insight and protocols.
Scott is wrong again. It's not that we "won" or were anti-government. It's that we learned the illness itself was mostly benign except to at-risk groups, and that various supplements would make the illness trivial.
We therefore saw clearly the manipulation, lies, and control. We now want JUDGEMENT against all those who knowingly perpetrated this CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.
Just as at the start of the 19th century laws were created and enforced to stop the child-labor and dangerous working conditions of the slaughterhouses, we want laws created and enforced that prevent this mass deception from ever happening again. Likewise with VOTER FRAUD.
people did their own research and came to informed decisions based upon information that was available and that which was kept hidden from the public
- - - - - - -
It was easy to find that
all previous attempts at making a coronavirus vaccine failed, if you read Free Republic
people who had more stored iron were at higher risk
People didn’t have the context for the information about iron.
Men who consume chocolate or meat consume more iron than they need. People who have more iron than they need have many problems, for example, higher triglycerides, weakness against infections.
The newpapers published very early that men and older people were at higher risk. They have more stored iron.