To: Signalman
And still, he contemptuously calls them “anti-vaxxx” even as likely most are thoroughly vaccinated by normal vaccine standards.
3 posted on
01/24/2023 9:17:28 AM PST by
Sgt_Schultze
(When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves)
To: Sgt_Schultze; Signalman
And still, he contemptuously calls them “anti-vaxxx” even as likely most are thoroughly vaccinated by normal vaccine standards.I can't fault Mr. Adams for his usage of that word. I don't regard it as "contemptuous" of those who abjure the Jab!
Rather, as I understand it, referring to it as a "vaxx" (rather than as a "vaccination") - and all the related words (incl. "anti-vaxxer," etc.) - already strongly implies that one does not regard it as a true vaccine. It already implies doubt and/or healthy skepticism.
Regards,
37 posted on
01/24/2023 11:44:36 AM PST by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: Sgt_Schultze
And still, he contemptuously calls them “anti-vaxxx” even as likely most are thoroughly vaccinated by normal vaccine standards. Yeah, the little Pfizer salespeople here on FR do the same thing.
50 posted on
02/26/2023 9:11:33 AM PST by
Allegra
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson