So, if you have a 10% chance of dying from an infection, but a 20% chance of dying from the cure, and government officials force you to take it, you think that is fine then?
You cling to the government fostered fallacy that a “vaccination” that doesn’t not stop people from repeatedly contracting a virus, and does not stop the spread of a virus, is going to magically eradicate a virus.
rlmorel wrote: “So, if you have a 10% chance of dying from an infection, but a 20% chance of dying from the cure, and government officials force you to take it, you think that is fine then?”
That’s an absurd hypothetical. No one has made any claims remotely like that.
rlmorel wrote: “You cling to the government fostered fallacy that a “vaccination” that doesn’t not stop people from repeatedly contracting a virus, and does not stop the spread of a virus, is going to magically eradicate a virus.”
You cling to the fallacy that a vaccine must stop all infections to be consider a vaccine.
You also cling to the fallacy that a vaccine must stop all spread to be considere a vaccine.
Vaccines do not have to be 100% effective. None are. Not even the most effective ones.