Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: devane617

“originally—well crafted law that has been so bastardized that it is nothing more than a hollow shell of its original intent.”

There are a few hidden assumptions in that post.

The biggest one is “original intent”.

Whose original intent—yours? Some of the writers of the legislation? Some of the lobbyists for the legislation?

I would argue that there were some dark actors behind the legislation that knew full well the havoc it would cause—and they had “original intent”.


13 posted on 01/19/2023 9:26:52 AM PST by cgbg (Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cgbg

I was part of writing of the original legislation in mid to late 1980’s. Much of the original legislation was aimed at mobility issues and the focus was much more narrow than the broad current laws which has been added to and bastardized by politicians.

As an example, the handicapped parking laws were originally intended for those of us that use wheelchairs full time, but over time the gray panthers screamed loud enough that many changes were made in all states that allowed virtually anyone to use HP. Now, most LE find the law so hard to enforce that no one does so. In fact, I hear from very reliable sources that Walmart forbids local LE from issuing citations in the parking lots.

The ADA, like HP, is a mere shadow of its original content.


14 posted on 01/19/2023 10:02:35 AM PST by devane617 (Discipline Is Reliable, Motivation Is Fleeting..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson