Posted on 01/18/2023 12:51:36 PM PST by nickcarraway
Cave’s “ The Boatman Calls “ album is a masterpiece . I must play it later on today Japan time .
One of my fave tracks by Nick : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qap4DCbhA4U
nice
I am wondering if you had just told it that the question DID contain all the information it needed, what it would have done.
The Mercy Seat -— OK i heard Cash do that, good stuff
Then you’ve missed out.
I will check him out. I’m not much of an alternative fan, but I will still give him a listen.
So much music, so little time.
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=kf_zVzvYWuw&feature=share
Try this one.
Jubilee Street, live in Copenhagen.
that’s not my experience
but in my time on it (only a few weeks) I’ve seen it give qualifiers to writing poetry which it didn’t do when I first got on it and I’ve also seen it get a fact wrong (nothing controversial or opinion oriented) and then I asked it to doublecheck and it came back with the correct answer and said it was sorry about the previous answer....
in my experience it would depend on how you ask the question
you can’t pick a fight with it and it’s also not going to easily weigh in on things that are clearly in the realm of opinion
but if you use it for sort of basic research and straight up facts (like I do) its an amazing tool and I’ve used it in this capacity for several projects generally in the energy realm and it never maligns oil and gas....and when facts about the benefits of oil and gas are relevant to the discussion, it never hesitates to cough them up
all that said, here soon i will push the envelope on oil and gas facts and see if it goes green fanatic
another post was from a physicist who described how he got it to invent a property which definitely did not exist - with citations which also did not exist but sounded credible.
if I run into it I will link it, it was weeks ago, either on elon or pmarca’s twitters.
I think the key is to use it for basic foundational research of broad trends....not drilling down on specifics too much. basically journalistic depth.
I think journalists should be very afraid.
I don’t think scholars should be.
Used like that, I’ve found it to be a great tool.....
You’ve missed out
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.