[jimbug]

Funny how all this is starting to hit the fan since fauci retired.

[ransomnote]

ransomnote: in the tables below, 'Covid19-2 refers to the bivalent Covid 'vaccine'.

( Almost every stroke reported to the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is recorded post Covid 'vaccine' administration.)

† Because some cases have multiple vaccinations and symptoms, a single case can account for multiple entries in this table. This is why the Total Count is greater than 3,352 (the number of cases found), and the Total Percent is greater than 100.

 

Here's the breakdown by age:

A related issue, 96% of cerebrovascular accidents the CDC published in their Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting system following occurred following 'vaccination' with the Covid 'vaccine'. The impact is that of a stroke, without the continued presence of a blood clot as normally found in ischaemic stroke/embolic stroke.

       

Prior research indicated that 1% of actual adverse events are published in the VAERS database. This would mean there may have been close to 1 million cerebrovascual accidents reported to the CDC. The damage is present as if the person had a stroke but the clot is gone/resolved.

Here's the breakdown by age (most occur in 65 to 79 years of age range).

[rktman]

Should this be “!!!!BREAKING!!!”? Or at least “ HEALTH BOMBSHELL!”.... 🔬😱😵🚫😷💉🐎💩. 😁👍

[iontheball]

I'm getting punchy. All I can say is dah11

[cuban leaf]

How long have we here at FR called it the clot shot? 🤣

[T.B. Yoits]

Early?

signal?

How about LATE recognition of ALARMS that have been screaming for more than two years?

[ransomnote]

PING

[logi_cal869]

I thought that they said there wasn’t after all.

Such BS. The obfuscation machine is now in high gear.

VAERS doesn’t matter. We all know the numbers being reported are garbage.

Worse, deaths are not being investigated, nor are they being accurately coded. It’s been proven.

The only data we’ll have is to study what many of us believe will be a spike in ‘excess deaths’ of various causes, including both heart attack and cancer as the leading indicators.

There will be no direct evidence; $$ has assured us of that. As well, there will be no investigation by the government. Again, $$ has assured us of that.

The argument that asking questions and drawing correlations about the jabs and those who appear to be dying more frequently is somehow hysterical or emotional in the absence of direct evidence is laughable.