You don't know any violent insurrectionist terrorists like these guys?
Posted on 01/13/2023 5:44:57 AM PST by MtnClimber
The jury trial of Richard Barnett, the man famously photographed with his feet on a desk in Nancy Pelosi’s office on January 6, 2021, is underway in Washington, D.C. Nearly two years to the date of his arrest, Barnett finally had a chance to defend himself in court on multiple charges, including obstruction of an official proceeding.
But it was not the fiery, outspoken Barnett who provided the most jaw-dropping testimony in the trial so far. To the contrary, one of the government’s own witnesses confirmed under defense cross-examination that “agents provocateur” were heavily involved in instigating the events of January 6.
Captain Carneysha Mendoza, a tactical commander for U.S. Capitol Police at the time, testified Wednesday how a group of agitators destroyed security barriers and lured people to Capitol grounds that afternoon:
Defense Counsel Brad Geyer: Isn’t it true that you had a lot of people, a large quantity of people walking down two streets that dead-ended at the Capitol?
Mendoza: Yes, sir.
Geyer: And would it be fair to say that at least at some of the leading edges of that crowd, they contained bad people or provocateurs; is that fair?
Mendoza: It’s fair.
Geyer: Dangerous people?
Mendoza: Yes.
Geyer: Violent people?
Mendoza: Yes.
Geyer: Highly trained violent people?
Mendoza: Yes.
Geyer: Highly trained violent people who work and coordinate together?
Mendoza: Yes
It was a stunning admission, representing the first time a top law enforcement official stated under oath (to my knowledge) that a coordinated, experienced group of agitators engaged in much of the mischief early that day. Under further questioning, Mendoza acknowledged those same individuals “pushed through barriers, removed barriers, threw barriers over the side, removed fencing, and eased the flow of people into places where they shouldn’t be.” This happened around 1:00 p.m., the same time the joint session of Congress convened to debate the results of the 2020 presidential election.
Hiding the pivotal role of still unidentified—and uncharged—agitators on January 6 is just one reason why the government has successfully sought to conceal thousands of hours of footage captured by the Capitol police’s security system before, during, and after the protest.
As I explained in May 2021, Capitol police immediately designated roughly 14,000 hours of surveillance video as “security information” that should not be released to the public.
Thomas DiBiase, general counsel for Capitol police, the technical owner of the video trove, signed an affidavit in March 2021 objecting to the widespread dissemination of footage “related to the attempted insurrection.” DiBiase claimed the agency wanted to prevent “those who might wish to attack the Capitol again” from accessing interior views of the building.
The Department of Justice subsequently labeled the footage as “highly sensitive government material” subject to strict protective orders in court proceedings. Defendants must comply with onerous rules before viewing any surveillance video associated with their case.
There are, of course, exceptions for any party helping to enforce the “insurrection” narrative. For example, the House committee handling Donald Trump’s post-January 6 impeachment was allowed to use portions of the super-secret reel. So, too, was HBO in producing its January 6 documentary. The January 6 select committee aired extensive if highly selective surveillance footage during their televised performances.
And that brief clip of Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) running in a hallway on January 6? It was clearly an image intended to mock his alleged cowardice that day. And, of course, it was Capitol surveillance video.
If it’s safe to place the video in the hands of Representative Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the biggest deceiver in Congress, and random HBO film producers, then it’s safe to place all the footage in the hands of the American people. Which is why calls by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) to fully release the surveillance video are a welcome, and necessary, step in providing a complete account about the events of January 6 to the public.
(The Committee on House Administration, now under Republican control, is one of two congressional committees with access to the full library of video.)
The recordings, Gaetz said in an interview this week, “would give more full context to that day rather than the cherry-picked moments that the January 6 committee tried to use to inflame and further divide our country.”
That demand undoubtedly will be met with fierce resistance by the same lawmakers, government agencies, and media organizations incessantly bleating about the need to “tell the truth” about what happened before and on January 6.
So, what exactly will the tapes reveal?
The footage, which captured the inside and outside of the building, will show how many agitators and/or federal assets were staged at various locations early in the day. Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.) might finally get an answer to the question that FBI Director Christopher Wray refused to answer during a congressional hearing last year—whether FBI informants disguised as Trump supporters were planted inside the building prior to the initial breach.
To that end, the video could show who instructed two men how to open the two-ton Columbus Doors on the east side of the Capitol Building, creating an access point for hordes of protesters. Ditto for entry points at other locations.
Will the video identify the individuals who erected the “gallows” featuring an orange noose allegedly built to “hang” Vice President Mike Pence? Just like the identity of the suspect who allegedly planted the pipe bombs at the DNC and RNC, no one has been identified or charged with constructing that stage on government property—another unanswered question the footage will answer.
The public undoubtedly will be shocked to see police officers from Capitol police and D.C. Metropolitan Police Departments viciously attacking crowds of people assembled outside the Capitol. Mendoza’s testimony also confirmed that Capitol police officers used nonlethal “munitions” on hundreds of individuals beginning shortly after 1:00 p.m. Weaponry included pepper balls—projectiles containing a chemical irritant shot from a launcher similar to a paintball gun—gas, rubber bullets, and flashbangs, a less-than-lethal grenade that likely caused the fatal heart attacks of two Trump supporters that afternoon.
Not only will the public see what happened to those two men, Kevin Greeson and Benjamin Phillips, but they will also see evidence of the numerous, serious injuries inflicted on dozens of people, including children and elderly women, at the hands of police. Are Americans prepared to see how law enforcement handled the dead bodies of Ashli Babbitt and Rosanne Boyland?
It will be tough to watch.
More importantly, the footage will indicate which cameras were disabled before the protest. The government’s claim that security cameras are not installed outside the Columbus Doors is questionable at best. A full comparison between the Capitol’s closed-circuit television system and the cameras operable on January 6 is a must.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on Thursday endorsed Gaetz’s calls to release the footage. “I think the American public should actually see all what happened,” McCarthy told reporters. “Yes, I’m engaged to do that.”
If McCarthy follows through on his promise, the world will see the biggest inside job—an actual coup—in U.S. history unfold before their eyes. Not only is it necessary to expose the truth of January 6 but to exonerate innocent Americans whose lives have been destroyed in the aftermath.
Roll the tapes.
Plus the technology of deep fake. They’ve had time to produce fake digital evidence.
The testimony did no such thing.Any statement that it did is "hopium/kraken/clickbait."
You don't know any violent insurrectionist terrorists like these guys?
Nothing to worry about. The recordings are all safely stored on a server in Chappaqua, NY.
If the Republicans are real about any of these they have to find out who the truly violent ones were, the instigators, and see if they were ever charged with anything. IF not dox them, make them public and ask WHY they were never charged but a guy who put his feet on a desk were.
Hmm, this Captain Carneysha Mendoza... :
Who is Carneysha Mendoza? Capitol Police captain hailed ‘true American hero’ for enduring ‘chemical burns on face’
https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/23/politics/carneysha-mendoza-capitol-police-riot/index.html
Capitol Police Capt. Carneysha Mendoza’s Harrowing Senate Testimony About The Insurrection
“As an American and an Army veteran, it’s sad to see us attacked by our fellow citizens,” Mendoza testified.
https://newsone.com/4096461/carneysha-mendoza-senate-capitol-testimony-full-text/
This explains Barnett’s attorney’s line of questioning.
Funny, though, why a search of Mendoza’s testimony per the Kelly article yields not a single MSM hit. Epoch Times picked it up: https://www.theepochtimes.com/highly-trained-and-violent-provocateurs-in-crowds-on-jan-6-us-capitol-police-captain-testifies_4981400.html
Those guys look like veterans to me, Fido. And if they want to start an uprising in the open, I’d leave them alone. For now.
I agreed with you.
I said the exact same thing.
I have the list from the 2016 inaugural. they can compare lists. none of the 200 were prosecuted beyond initial charges.
The implication was the the witness admitted that government controlled-agents were manipulating the crowd.And it which way does that negate the possibility that those provocateurs were not "government-controlled" hopium/karen/clickbait or otherwise?
---------------------
The testimony did no such thing.Any statement that it did is "hopium/kraken/clickbait."
Here ya go, buddy - Fallacy of Irrelevant Reasons:
https://human.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Philosophy/Critical_Reasoning%3A_A_User‘s_Manual_(Southworth_and_Swoyer)/10%3A_Relevance_Irrelevance_and_Fallacies/10.02%3A_Fallacy_of_Irrelevant_Reasons
I don’t expect you to understand it, I think you have a problem with logical reasoning.
Yes, I understand that was your impression of the matter. My comment was a description of the hopium crowd, which I think both of us recognize.
Sorry, the page at https://human.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Philosophy/Critical_Reasoning%3A_A_User could not be found.
btw, you’re very animated about this. That’s called a tell.
I'm just sick of these clickbait Kracken nonsense postings that promise but don't deliver. It make FR look like a bunch of bozos.
There’s a vast difference between exposing injustice and justice applied. And I doubt anyone here actually thinks justice will prevail following the upcoming House investigations into the J-6 fraud. It is reasonable to expect, however, that those investigations further expose the clear injustice by and the illegal activities of government actors.
That is why this article is important: a Capitol Police senior officer admits under oath that the “leading edge” of the Capitol breach was done by “highly trained” “agents provocateurs” who acted in coordination with one another. Sure, there was no admission in the testimony that these were government or government-trained agents. No need for that, since the cumulative evidence of events and their timing point to government coordination, starting w/ the movements of Harris that day, the coordinated timing of the “discovery” of the “bombs”, and the assault on the Capitol barriers by “Highly trained violent people” (several of whom have gone unidentified and uncharged, along w/ the “bomber”). There’s plenty more, including the actions of the Capitol police, which were designed to both spur violence and allow a successful violent breach of the Capitol, while also shepherding peaceful protesters into the building.
This conclusion isn’t fantasy. Sadly, what is fantastical is any hope that justice will prevail.
You describe that position as if it would only be held by someone with a high degree of professional competence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.