Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jeffersondem
https://elections.harpweek.com/1864/Overview-1864-2.asp#top

Furthermore:
“The National Union (Republican) Convention The nominating convention of the National Union Party, dominated by Republicans with a scattering of War Democrats, met in Baltimore on June 7-8, 1864. By that time, Lincoln’s supporters had thwarted various insurgencies and secured control of the proceedings. The platform called for pursuit of the war until the Confederacy surrendered unconditionally; a constitutional amendment for the abolition of slavery; aid to disabled Union veterans; continued European neutrality; enforcement of the Monroe Doctrine; encouragement of immigration; and construction of a transcontinental railroad. It also praised the use of black troops and Lincoln’s management of the war. On the first presidential ballot, Lincoln got all of the votes except for 22 cast by Missouri delegates for General Grant (506 of 528). The Missouri faction, however, quickly changed their votes to make Lincoln’s renomination unanimous.

Like many presidents, Lincoln gave little thought to the vice presidency; therefore, he left the selection of his running mate to the convention, expressing no opinion publicly or privately. Vice President Hannibal Hamlin desired to be renominated, but he generated little enthusiasm. Some thought it was important strategically and symbolically to nominate a War Democrat, such as former U.S. Senator Daniel Dickinson of New York. Dickinson’s election, though, would likely put pressure on Secretary of State William Seward, another New Yorker, to resign from the cabinet. The convention swung to Andrew Johnson, the Union military governor of Tennessee, who had the double distinction of being a War Democrat and a Southern Unionist. He was nominated overwhelmingly on the first vice-presidential ballot. Since most radicals were satisfied with the party platform and the direction, though not the pace, of the Lincoln administration on emancipation, Johnson’s nomination was palatable to them.”

The above would seem to further refute your inaccuracies.

19 posted on 01/16/2023 3:42:35 PM PST by HandyDandy (Life is what you make it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: jeffersondem
Note well:
“Like many presidents, Lincoln gave little thought to the vice presidency; therefore, he left the selection of his running mate to the convention, expressing no opinion publicly or privately.”

Which begs the question, Where did you get your opinion?

20 posted on 01/16/2023 3:50:06 PM PST by HandyDandy (Life is what you make it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: HandyDandy; BroJoeK

“The above would seem to further refute your inaccuracies.”

I appreciate your opinion.

In this case, I value Brother Joe’s post 16 more.

“You’re right . . .” he said to me.


21 posted on 01/16/2023 7:20:04 PM PST by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson