>>>On what grounds?<<<
How about receiving two bitcoins after the vote to accept the electoral count, for starters. Quite a payoff there.
He had a constitutional duty to step in and refuse to accept the results without an investigation into the possibility of fraud. There was obvious, blatant fraud and the whole thing was quashed.
If you are a never Trumper, I’m not interested in debating with you.
First time I've heard that. Can you elaborate on it? Thanks.