Replies

“She was found not guilty of that offense by the judge...”

Again, no she wasn’t. You can’t be found not guilty of an offense you were not tried for. That offense never made it to trial because the judge tossed it out. The evidence involved for it was never displayed to the public and it was taken out by the judge, not a jury nor was a reason provided except the judge felt there was not enough evidence to continue. In other simple words, the offense wouldn’t be proved so there’s no trial. That is not guilty, that’s the court’s version of no contest. And the judge alone made that move with no legal challenge. A deal was made and did not go public.

So even though she lied about the proven selling of the stock, her communications with her brokers at Merrill, and was found guilty of stonewalling and lying to federal investigators at the justice department concerning the short sale and imprisoned for that effort which kept the evidence concerning the short selling action out of court with the one person call by the judge that kept her out of prison for that possible 20 years and as much as $5M fine which I showed you from your entry, I find it hard to understand how you can think she was tried for it, and since the investigation was specifically aimed at the evidence of that short sell she lied about, how can you lie about something that didn’t happen and you were found guilty of lying about it and imprisoned but not for the crime you lied about?

wy69