Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: devere

“Actually, Martha Stewart was found not guilty of insider trading by a jury of her peers.”

No she wasn’t.

Martha Stewart was accused of insider trading after she sold four thousand ImClone shares one day before that firm’s stock price plummeted. Although the charges of securities fraud were thrown out, Ms. Stewart was found guilty of four counts of obstruction of justice and lying to investigators.

https://harbert.auburn.edu/binaries/documents/center-for-ethical-organizational-cultures/cases/martha-stewart.pdf

The insider trading charge and all security fraud charges were tossed out and never made it to trial. She got a free ride.

wy69


36 posted on 01/08/2023 7:49:48 PM PST by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: whitney69

Ok, she was tried before a jury and and then acquitted by the judge, who considered the insider trading case so weak he didn’t even let it go to the jury. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1066381.html

If Martha had been smart enough never to have talked to the FBI, she never would have gone to jail. And the same goes for General Flynn.


39 posted on 01/08/2023 8:37:10 PM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson