Posted on 01/07/2023 7:41:57 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski
We know a nurse (RN) who was seeking a full-time job with benefits including health insurance. Had a job but pay was not very good.
Said RN applied to job at VA and had to get the clot-shots in order to get hired. Although thoroughly opposed to the JJJ maybe she was not truly opposed? Well, is it like being an economic refugee?
She apologized to her mom and explained that she felt forced into the JimJonesJabz. Nice people. Sad story.
One irony is that if nasty side-effects result … she will have health insurance.
A very messed up world.
In before the shot shills slandering and discrediting her, claiming they, as anonymous internet posters of uncertain credentials, as more qualified to speak on matter of which they have no experience and she doesn’t know what she’s talking about.….
Too late, my FRiend.
The lying $hot $hills - some of who have mysteriously disappeared, or, have now slithered on to Uke pu$hing - maligned and smeared this REAL, and, highly accredited military doc, when Dr Long first wrote/reported her findings…with the pilots.
They claimed she was not even a real person.
Ironic…the fake “experts” making such a claim.
Such dedication to a cause is admirable in and of itself.
Such misplaced dedication to lies, propaganda, and government agenda at all costs is tragic.
Agree....only, I call it evil.
Thanks for the ping. She appears credible to me. She is testifying under the threat of perjury if she is lying I would imagine. I like the language of Jane Long that many are ‘slithering’ away who once boldly claimed the vaccines prevent illness, transmission and are safe.
Open the debate!
If COVID was the killer they said it was, Congress would’ve lined up to get the shots, and not exempted themselves.
is necessary to eliminate forces that would be redundant under a one world government. The military would also be a threat to the powers that be under that hypothetical one world government.
“So she shouldn’t have told us the truth about what was going on, right?”
Really...no. Medical confidentiality is applied at all levels of our justice system. And what happens in the military medicine world not being made public, or partially let out, should have been handled at that level, not in a civilian court. And when she has to go public with the people she was told not to talk about, it violates that trust as saying it happens requires proof, not conjecture.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), Public Law 104-191, was enacted on August 21, 1996 to cover this problem. The Privacy Rule protects all “individually identifiable health information” held or transmitted by a covered entity or its business associate, in any form or media, whether electronic, paper, or oral.
If she had gone to the lowest level of the command and voiced her concerns, among people with the need to know and clearance, it would have been done differently. But the inner workings of the military are none of the public’s business as they have just enough information to guess at what happened disregarding privacy like the doctor did. She broke both military and civilian law,
wy69
Thank you. Please add me to this ping list
Yes but she can’t violate the law by not testifying in court under oath....even the military can’t stop her from doing so.
This is interesting. Please explain the relational basis.
“If COVID was the killer they said it was...”
Oh, Covid is a killer as over 1.1 million have died from it’s complications in the US alone. But the vaccines have nothing to do with curing it, never have. They only make you feel better if you get it. There is no vaccine that kills the virus, the body does the work based upon immune system response. So it is not designed to cure, just to help the same way drugs like heroin, cocaine, and nowadays fentanyl and others on the street make you feel better with the illusion they are the answer to your problems. Does that mean they are part of the cure, no. But they can make dying a little less noticeable.
wy69
Sod off, Swampy, as the old saying goes.
At what point does her duty to the Hippocratic Oath as a doctor supersede harmful medical demands by her chain of command…?
Ping
“Yes but she can’t violate the law by not testifying in court under oath....even the military can’t stop her from doing so.”
Yes she can. Crimes committed outside a military installation by persons subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice which, normally, are tried by court martial will be investigated and prosecuted by the Department of Defense. The Department of Defense will provide immediate notice of significant cases to the appropriate Department of Justice investigative agency. The Department of Defense will provide immediate notice in all cases where one or more subjects is not under military jurisdiction unless the Department of Justice has relieved the Department of Defense of the reporting requirement for that type or class of crime.
https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-669-prosecution-military-personnel
She released information that will require validation of proof and directly violated Article 92 as dereliction of duty. There are sources to work to overturn and bring justice to this in the military to include the I.G. and a congressional investigation. She should have pleaded the fifth on that and referenced a military justice people to assist her. But by saying anything, she has harmed the trust and the reputation of the military medical field and the branch of service involved.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which apply to all civil cases filed in federal courts, require deponents to answer every question unless the information is privileged or the court has previously ordered that the information cannot be revealed. In a legal setting, a privilege is a protection a party invokes to keep the other side from learning certain private communications. The most common privilege is the attorney/client privilege, which nearly absolutely protects communications between an attorney and a client. Other privileges that vary by state include doctor/patient privilege and accountant/client privilege.
On a side note, according to DoD Directive 5124.02, it states:
Military Health System patients, MHSpatients have explicit rights about information disclosure; choice of providers;
health plans; access to emergency services; participation in treatment decisions; respect and nondiscrimination; privacy and security of personally identifiable information and appeals; as well as specific responsibilities to participate in their own health decisions. HIPPA goes even further, but you can find that if you wish.
Wy69
All that (original, as required by the court) documentation was transferred to the OKC Murrah Building the blowed up April 19, 1995 with all the Bush-Clinton-Mena documents, too.
Even purposely blowing up the kids in daycare that day wasn’t as evil as the rest of the Bush-Clinton plan for April 19, 1995.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.