Remdisiver isn’t a toxic treatment. That myth was spread by another fake doctor - a chiropractor out to sell books and patreon donations.
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/claim-that-antiviral-drug-remdesivir-killing-people-is-baseless/
https://www.jucm.com/update-dispel-the-myth-that-remdesivir-is-killing-people/
On 22 April 2022, following publication of new data from a clinical trial looking at the outcome of admission to hospital, WHO now suggests the use of remdesivir in mild or moderate COVID-19 patients who are at high risk of hospitalization.
https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/who-recommends-against-the-use-of-remdesivir-in-covid-19-patients
immunity will help blunt the XBB wave, according to Poeschla. And though monoclonal antibodies are less effective with XBB, other treatments — including Paxlovid, remdesivir and molnupiravir — appear to hold up well.
https://news.yahoo.com/symptoms-covid-variant-xbb-doctors-080002661.html
In September 2022, the WHO updated their guidelines to recommend use of remdesivir for both non-hospitalized and hospitalized patients.[132] This was based on final results from the SOLIDARITY trial that showed a reduction in mortality or progression to mechanical ventilation for non-ventilated patients.
Nonhospitalized outpatients
In January 2022, a study indicated that nonhospitalized people who were at high risk for COVID-19 progression had an 87% lower risk of hospitalization or death after a 3-day course of intravenous remdesivir.[133]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remdesivir#Society_and_culture
So the NIH trialed the drug again. I read that trial and read analysis of that trial, and it was not 'good news'. To make Remdesivir 'pass' they had to move the goal posts - now it was not cure but 'less likely to be hospitalized'. I recall problems with the trial (things that made results too weak to use) like small sample size for too short of a duration etc. It's bad enough that Remdesivir just doesn't work:

https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/AAC.01117-21

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33340409/
Also, it wasn't just a fake doctor talking about the harm to organs caused by Remdesivir, others with expertise joined in. The fact it's still being pushed as 'treatment' is sickening.
Dr. Paul Marik Reveals How “Dr. Death” Fauci Manipulated Studies to Approve Remdesivir

| HOROWITZ: THE $CIENCE OF REMDESIVIR VS. IVERMECTIN: A TALE OF TWO DRUGS |
Grimdeathisnear