Is that true? 1,598 yr vs 29 before the vaccine?
No, it's not true and you'll notice no source was cited.
Check articles site for links:
1. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061025
2. Kulvinder Kaur MD @dockaurG ·
Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusions all same.
▶️https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393512201982X
3. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13947
4. ***https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393512201982X
5. https://medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.11.22280963v1 12:44 PM · Dec 30, 2022
6.*****Our New Myocarditis Paper - Shows the Risk Highest in Young Men - Stratifying Factors Vinay Prasad MD MPH
2 days ago 10:22 AM · Jan 4, 2023 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tYcZq9bIYU
Prasad reviewed how many risk stratifiers — sex, age, dose number and manufacturer — were used in 29 post-vaccination myocarditis and pericarditis studies. A plurality (45%) had one or fewer, while 28% had all four.
[”The highest incidence of myocarditis ranged from 8.1-39 cases per 100,000 persons (or doses) in studies using four stratifiers,” the paper says. Six studies found at least 15 cases per 100,000 persons or doses for 12-24 year-old males after the second mRNA dose.
“Dose 2 is worse than dose 1. Moderna is worse than Pfizer,” Prasad wrote in an accompanying essay for the Sensible Medicine newsletter Tuesday. “But these differences are lost in analyses that lump together products or combine young men and old women.”]