[Tacrolimus1mg]

While I don’t plan on administering any COVID shots, and I know that there is a legal distinction between the original EUA-marketed shots and Comirnaty (one cannot be substituted for the other), I read this (https://brownstone.org/articles/is-pfizers-fda-approved-comirnaty-vaccine-available-in-the-us/) and it was not only a little old, but didn’t really give any answers. It was also wrong about the formulations being, “legally the same” if I read it correctly.

I then found this (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/10/20/fact-check-comirnaty-pfizers-fda-approved-vaccine-available-us/8538861002/), which is loaded with so much bullsh¡t it could supply the nation with fertilizer.

There was also this (https://www.city-data.com/forum/politics-other-controversies/3327322-cdc-confirms-comirnaty-not-available-usa.html) but it’s also a bit old.

I haven’t found anything more recent.

[monkeyshine]

It is very confusing. From what I can gather, it has some kind of vague blessing in the nether regions between EUA and full approval. None of these shots have met the high bar the FDA sets for approval of any other drug or biologic. But this isn't about science, it is about politics. If Conformity Comirnaty was given full approval, then the EUA for Moderna's and JNJ's shots must be revoked per the EUA regulations. So it's quite confusing, even though it did receive some kind of oblique natured approval.