“Ah, does that mean there were other interventions during Trump’s term that you DID approve of, other than Syria?”
Nope, as I noted in a prior post, I don’t blindly follow anyone Democrat, Republican, or Neocon. If the intervention is shown to be in US interests, then I’m good with it. It’s very simple.
“Nope, as I noted in a prior post, I don’t blindly follow anyone Democrat, Republican, or Neocon. If the intervention is shown to be in US interests, then I’m good with it. It’s very simple.”
Then you are, by definition, a “neocon” (unless you eschew capitalism), if the situation meets your approval. Democrat and Republican are political parties, and one actively joins enrolls in them; so you can be one or the other even though you do not approve of an action or policy the party has adopted. Whereas, “neocon” is strictly situational. And thus, its broad-brush employment is meaningless.