Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RitaOK
probably should have included one of the filings.

https://casetext.com/case/sharratt-v-murtha

"For the foregoing reasons, we hereby vacate the District Court's order denying certification pending discovery and remand the case with instructions to the District Court to substitute the United States as the defendant in place of Congressman Murtha.   Because the FTCA excepts tort claims “arising out of ․ libel [or] slander,” 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h), from the Government's sovereign immunity waiver, Wuterich's case is barred by sovereign immunity.   Accordingly, the District Court will be required to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge EDWARDS."

1,680 posted on 01/09/2023 7:47:26 PM PST by stylin19a (a principle to keep a person in everlasting ignorance ? - contempt prior to investigation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1673 | View Replies ]


To: stylin19a

sorry that case quote s/be from WUTERICH v. MURTHA

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-dc-circuit/1262084.html


1,686 posted on 01/09/2023 7:55:12 PM PST by stylin19a (a principle to keep a person in everlasting ignorance ? - contempt prior to investigation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1680 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson