Singapore specifically cited a high school kid who had a heart attack lifting weights about a week after the shot as the reason for the reccomendation. It may be 23 weeks, a month or year in reality.
Doesn’t this STAND out as a clear WARNING for you/your kids/loved ones....to NOT take such a risky therapeutic????
And, you didn’t answer my original questions....
Has there EVER been a ‘vaccine’ shot that comes with a recommendation of waiting a week...or any amount of time....before exercising??
And....what about these $hots would cause this type of (waiting) recommendation????
Do you NOT see the problem, here, with the dangerous $hot?
“Has there EVER been a ‘vaccine’ shot that comes with a recommendation of waiting a week...or any amount of time....before exercising??”
Not that I know of. Can you cite one?
It’s madness to give the jab to young, healthy athletes who have virtually no risk from covid.
And since the jab does not prevent transmission, jabbing the athlete doesn’t help anyone.
Question for Science: did the jab help or hurt mankind’s response to covid?
I don't think anyone under 60 or ANYONE that has previously had Covid should have received the shots.
I work for a major corporation that was going to fire me unless I get the shot. I told them to Fire me.
So they gave me a "religious exemption" to fill out.
For my Religious exemption I cited "Science and the Scientific Method" and for "Religious Text" I gave them a JAMA article on superiority of Natural Immunity over Vaccine Immunity.
I'm still tested weekly and have never tested positive.
It's pretty obvious the pushing of the vax is to eliminate any control group, so all damage caused by the Vaxx's are deemed "inconclusive".
Young men having herat attacks will be the New Normal.