Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Getready

He’s a safety, and in general, safeties aren’t the best tacklers, in terms of technique.


129 posted on 01/03/2023 7:34:44 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

From my playing days the safety was there because they could finish off a runner. Usually sure handed and few would get past them in an open field. The strong safety usually had a larger receiver to cover and tended to be more aggressive. Ronnie Lott and Jack Tatum come to mind.
You make a good point however. And today’s defensive backs don’t “wrap up” the receivers and go “through” them like I was taught to do.


149 posted on 01/03/2023 7:50:30 AM PST by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and harder to find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator
Re: "in general, safeties aren't the best tacklers, in terms of technique"

Good point.

He has the slender build of a free safety.

A free safety has two basic job responsibilities...

Double team receivers who are running deep routes - or - blitzing the quarterback.

The “strong safety” - who is a really fast underweight linebacker - is the guy who is supposed to tackle full speed runners who break past the linebackers.

169 posted on 01/03/2023 8:14:10 AM PST by zeestephen (43,000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson