I’ve noticed that even the definition of socialism has changed. Some of the younger generation have been told that socialism is simply the govt paying for things like libraries, etc. Nothing about transfer of wealth.
Hard to change the definition of “Hunger”. If you can’t grow food, buy food, find food and the world governments are successful at eliminating all current sources of food supplies, you WILL know hunger. What little food there will be is surely going to be reserved for the ruling class....but not you. IF you join a gardening club or online social media site that shares gardening tips and ideas, there will come a day when government will not just be looking to take your guns, they will be looking to take your food too. You know...because “you didn’t grow that...somebody else made that happen” is the mantra of barack that made it so and it will be confiscated for the good of all mankind. Wondering now how “hunger” will be redefined so it sounds more palatable to the huddled masses. At least more palatable than “you VILL eat ze bugs!”.
I have seen people define Socialism as being socially active.
But I live next to a college town