Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EEGator

Given the unprecedented breadth and depth of the opioid crisis we are currently experiencing and that our Southern border remains open as a pathway, shouldn’t we reconsider how we regard recreational opioid users and our approaches to them, even after their deaths? I’m thinking about how to make unwanted behaviors in our society socially unacceptable again to discourage them at the individual and local level since our government seems to to be too concerned. Thoughts? When we subsidize something, even by tacitly looking the other way and biting our tongues, we get more of it. When we tax it by going negative on it we should get less of it?


17 posted on 12/29/2022 7:07:46 AM PST by desertsolitaire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: desertsolitaire

” ...doesn’t seem to be too concerned.”


18 posted on 12/29/2022 7:08:30 AM PST by desertsolitaire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: desertsolitaire

How about holding the dealers and government responsible?

I don’t think drug users think using illegal drugs is socially acceptable, they just do it regardless of the view.

Kicking dead users in an echo chamber online does nothing except look ugly.
People are free to post what they want, and I am free to respond.

As an aside, after we controlled Afghanistan, the country’s opium output reached a high. Maybe that’s not an accident.


23 posted on 12/29/2022 7:17:11 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson