A brief survey of my 19 year posting history on FR would make it clear who’s side I’m on. As far as my position on the vax, I’m not vaxed nor are my family. I’ve advocated for ivermectin on this forum. I don’t give a rat’s ass what the CDC, FDA, AMA or any other sold-out three letter organization says. Don’t be lazy. Use the search tools available to you on this site. Another form of laziness is using anecdote to try to prove a point. We rightly mock the left when they do it to “prove” global warming. We should be better than that. Regarding the anthrax shot, I took it before my first Iraq deployment. Yeah, I had some doubts but there was a real risk of anthrax exposure. I did support those who refused. So, those are my bona fides. Hope they are satisfactory. Actually, I don’t give a rip what you think.
You, like the others, resist putting a face on the current crimes against humanity, (on a global scale) because you think you must hold yourself to some nebulous self-imposed scientific standard that prohibits appeals to compassion, even as you must know the conspirators in the media, pharma, and government control the false and cynical lies constantly being rammed down our throats as "the science".
Perhaps if you went from the military to an FDA or other civilian government job you might be one of the hacks labeling anecdotes of horrible deaths and injuries by these experimental "vaccines" as disinformation, characterizing them as "not proven", and liaison with media to censor any anecdotal anti-jab stories on social media.
As for anthrax, you followed orders and took the vax (protocol being six doses) and protected your career. There was NO RISK of anthrax exposure in theater, as we soon confirmed, but by taking it you endorsed it, especially considering your position. Don't tell me the lie that you took it and simultaneously protested it. The ONLY time it was ever used was when weaponized anthrax was sent in letters here in the USA, probably by agents within the government to drum up support for further experimental vaccine development against bioweapons (and especially for the funding and big research and development contracts that followed the 2004 BioShield Act). The military used us (you, not me, I was a true Refusenik) as experimental subjects then, and will in the future, just as they did to my fellow patriots with this EUA "vaccine" that they falsely claim is "safe and effective" even as they deny informed consent, a basic human right.
You never fell on your sword, for your own health or anyone else's. If any group of doctors makes a mockery of "do no harm" I would start with military doctors. I can't think of even ONE military doctor that truly advocated for the troops over the unsafe anthrax vaccine. Posting anonymous virtue-signaling to FR is easy. The whole sordid humanitarian disaster makes me even more respectful of Meryl Nass. No military doctor has ever displayed even one percent of her character.
Keep up the good work.