To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Hmm. She gave him authority to access her phone.
So he was authorized.
Strict construction of criminal law = not guilty.
Cops always over charge.
To: TigerClaws
Access to repair the phone isn't the same as permission to copy and distribute. Similarly if I give a valet keys to my car it is to park it, it is not giving permission to take it out for a joyride.
It is questionable whether this would be legal if the repair tech took ownership of the phone for non-payment like was done with Hunter Biden's phone. Does ownership only apply to the hardware or to the data too?
10 posted on
12/23/2022 12:28:00 PM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Soon the January 6 protesters will be held (without trial or bail) longer than Jefferson Davis was.)
To: TigerClaws
“ Cops always over charge.”
He could have been charged with theft or conversion.
To: TigerClaws
“I guess from your post that it would be ok for the plumber to browse through the underwear drawers and take what he desires?
To: TigerClaws
That’s what it looks like to me also.🤨
36 posted on
12/23/2022 4:57:31 PM PST by
BiteYourSelf
( Earth first, we'll strip mine the other planets later.)
To: TigerClaws
He wasn’t authorized to take her data, no matter how good it is.
43 posted on
12/23/2022 6:23:26 PM PST by
OKSooner
("Oh, the mad fools!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson