The caliber of he revolvers was not mentioned in the Freedom of information act response. It was almost certainly .44 magnums.
1 posted on
12/23/2022 4:53:07 AM PST by
marktwain
To: marktwain
Climate change claim scam does yield a consequence.
Poor polar bear.
2 posted on
12/23/2022 4:57:07 AM PST by
Recompennation
(Don’t blame me my vote didn’t count )
To: marktwain
When I read the headline I just wondered where he got the guns, haha.
5 posted on
12/23/2022 5:56:48 AM PST by
tiki
(Electiongate)
To: marktwain
I often am stopped by revolvers, particularly at gun shows.
“This one is different. Tell me about it!”
7 posted on
12/23/2022 5:59:58 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(The firearms I own today, are the firearms I will die with. How I die will be up to them.)
To: marktwain
So, how hard is it to acquire .44 Mag revolvers in Norway?
To: marktwain
No reason why it needed to be a 44 magnum. It didn’t kill the bear - and a 44 magnum has a poor chance of killing a bear too!
Bears, including grizzlies, often take off after being shot by 9mm and 38s. Maybe the noise, or the sudden sharp pain they didn’t expect. Now, if it was a mama protecting its babies, that might be different.
14 posted on
12/23/2022 6:24:53 AM PST by
Mr Rogers
(We're a nation of feelings, not thoughts.)
To: marktwain
18 posted on
12/23/2022 6:44:17 AM PST by
budj
(Combat vet, second of three generations.)
To: marktwain
How about the polar bear attacks in the cities, like NYC, Chicago, etc. A revolver would work there too.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
