Replies

I beg to differ with the continuous lamecherry approach of Martin in style and substance. Every.Single.Time.

This latest from Armstrong, albeit a brief excerpt, is a fine example of fear porn...

” The US just agreed to a military partnership with Israel for we are looking at the Middle East erupting into war. I cannot believe how DUMB our leaders really are. If the shoe was on the other foot, I would launch the missiles from North Korea against the South and Japan, China takes Taiwan, Iran kicks ass in the Middle East, and Russia nukes Kyiv and Warsaw. Both Hitler and Napoleon lost because you CANNOT wage a war on multiple fronts. The US thinks it can use the bodies of other nations and just supply the arms. If I wanted to take down the United States and Europe grinding them into the dirt, you wage war on four fronts simultaneously. Neither Europe nor the United States has the boots on the ground to defend against such an onslaught. “

— Martin Armstrong
— Armstrong Economics

TRUST Armstrong Economics

” The US just agreed to a military partnership with Israel

We have been in military partnership with Israel (IS) since 1953.

IS is designated as a U.S. Major Non-NATO Ally under U.S. law.

As of July 2021, the US has 629 active Foreign Military Sales (FMS) cases with IS
at a notional value approx. 23.2B.

for we are looking at the Middle East erupting into war.

IS is always at war, unconventional and 5GW, et. al. We are prepared.

I cannot believe how DUMB our leaders really are.

I cannot believe how gullible people are who:
a. believe our military wearing ladies red shoes defines our capabilities and readiness.
(Yes, I pushed that meme.)
b. believe a change of address from 'Sir' or 'Ma'am' defines our kinetic strength and dominance..
c. believe how viable AE articles are; part or parcel. ( Buy Gold, Buy Silver, Buy AE )

If the shoe was on the other foot,

ruh roh, here we go...

I would launch the missiles from North Korea against the South and Japan,

Joint Chiefs and all commanders would know in 5m, and a devastating and unrecoverable response would be unleashed upon a luddite nation; with easily repeatable maneuver warfare and a thousand real-time options.

China takes Taiwan,

After a successful first attack;
we'd then annihilate them with a symmetrical precision response they have not yet achieved,
nor could anticipate.

Perhaps that is why in speeches their leaders promise to do the same to us.
The US Military and partners are doctrinal, planned, tested, practiced, and fit.

Iran kicks ass in the Middle East,

Ridiculous, there is no there, there; no air there.
We are breathing their air, sharing their weather; we would defeat them at will.

and Russia nukes Kyiv and Warsaw.

The capabilities of the Russian army (and China, combined)
are no match for total war scenarios vs US.

And yes, there would be World War = III,
with immolation and millions+ lost;
but only one
ultimate victor.

A thought experiment we've done
reverses the UKR aggressor, that is:
who, what, where and how would the US take UKR? And what would it look like now?

Putin in comparison is a rookie using a full compliment of pawns.

Both Hitler and Napoleon lost because you CANNOT wage a war on multiple fronts.

That is precisely what the the Pentagon is tasked with continuously year over year,
and operationally for decades at a smaller scale.

Their 'we can't do it' and 'we need more cash' is the political arm, not the Strong-Arm.

The US thinks it can use the bodies of other nations and just supply the arms.

Marketing is good.
Sales are up.
AE shifts the argument here for weak minds.

If I wanted to take down the United States and Europe
grinding them into the dirt,
you wage war on four fronts simultaneously.

We are already fighting wars (of a type) on a dozen fronts; get in line,
maybe sign up for 5GW to update your old-school writing and thinking.

Neither Europe nor the United States has the boots on the ground to defend against such an onslaught.

It is not the onslaught, the surprise attack, the escalation, etc.
It will be the terrible precision response.

This is not cowboys vs. indians, Armstrong, this a toolbox a decade ahead of our rivals.

By latest estimates, the USA is in a first decade of a further century of dominance.
We win. And God wins.

Finally, the psychological warfare of AE traps one in a puzzle-like trance,
not unlike finely written Times articles where you may not agree,
yet the writing was oh, so delicious.

Their articles appear presently deployed to keep us busy and/or turned on each other
in fear and trepidation over fantastic scenarios painted in congress and the daily news-
causing confusion and lost opportunity.

Chin up, America. It's all just too good to be true.

We'd fight.

We'd win.

--- Foldspace Economics
--- Foldicimus Foldstrong
--- FoldSpace Family Office
--- Assoc. J5 | Strategy, Plans and Policy, Western Hemisphere
--- Operational, Field of Fight, theatres +

-Foldy

Q & A is off.

I thought of the Armstrong remarks as a predictable view through the eyes of our traditional enemies.

“If the shoe were on the other foot...” — Armstrong

If the shoe were on the other foot, our traditional enemies would have Biden, Blinken and Nuland, and therefore would not hesitate to rustle up some cranky allies to go “share the burden” for attacking some bankrupt nemesis-nation full of well vaxxed soldiers.

I don’t know about “writing style”, in this case.

Armstrong speaks in tones of yesterday’s American man, like many of our dads or uncles might have spoken, blunt, critical thinkers, didn’t mess around, back when you didn’t nuance “nuttin”.

I give him slack for being a curmudgeon (for good reason), and for never hearing of “Q” possibly, or rejecting Q. It’s no secret that people are skiddish about psyops in this electronic world.

I agree about boots on the ground, Biden style. Neanderthal lives in the White House.

It’s money and sci-fi and outer space instruments today.