“Involved in”. Tucker’s anonymous source “believes” the CIA was “involved”. Tucker says it was a coup, etc.
I think you’re splitting hairs, we would expect life or the gas chamber for anyone “involved in” a presidential assassination.
Bottom line, Tucker appears to be over-hyping.
He’s losing audience share so has to out carnival bark the others!
“Involved in”. Tucker’s anonymous source “believes” the CIA was “involved”. Tucker says it was a coup, etc.
I think you’re splitting hairs, we would expect life or the gas chamber for anyone “involved in” a presidential assassination.
Bottom line, Tucker appears to be over-hyping.
*****************************************************************
Well, “involved” could mean something as simple as having had Oswald as an asset at some point..