Ranked Choice voting is designed to elect middle of the road candidates who appeal to both parties.
We already have the uni-party and ranked choice voting will mean that candidates to the right or to the left will never win an election.
See cartoon above.
RCV was also designed to require the use of RCV-enabled voting machines.
Even states that don’t have RCV now use RCV-enabled voting machines.
Go figure.
>>> “Ranked Choice voting is designed to elect middle of the road candidates who appeal to both parties.” <<<
That’s how they sell it to well-meaning moderates. But its just another HUGE opportunity for thy lying cheating rats to “find” new ballots at each “Ranko-Voto” reshuffle. It’s mean to be so obtuse that nobody can EVER figure out who-what-struck-John.
At the end, the Rats, the sellout GOP, and the MSM will just announce another narrow Rat election win....
And that will be that.
Don’t fall for it. It’s a sucker game like 3 Card Monty or The Shell Game.
That is the essence of “Ranko-Voto.”
“Ranked Choice voting is designed to elect middle of the road candidates who appeal to both parties.
We already have the uni-party and ranked choice voting will mean that candidates to the right or to the left will never win an election.
“
THAT does seem to be the correct analysis.
Imagine the US Revolution with RCV.