Q: Are you stating that there is no INCREASED risk to a child from using vaccinated blood...?
Yes that is what I am saying. There is no evidence to suggest contrary. I am always willing to evaluate evidence and consider it’s conclusions. This is not evidence. If you can provide actual evidence supporting there is risk instead of theory I am all ears.
However the evidence thus far presented is not evidence at all. It is bad assumptions extrapolated to the extreme. There was a general earlier would a doctor allow his or her infant to receive a transfusion from a vaccinated pool and my answer is yes.
There is no clinical evidence to suggest there is increases risk from PRBC transfusion sourced from vaccinated vs unvaccinated. While I know this whole pure blood movement is fun and cute and allows some to feel superior, truth is it is a minority of people who are on the fringe.
With 250 M Americans vaccinated some multiple times there are close to one billion doses administered. There are literally tens of thousands of transfusion each month. This means millions of transfusions from a broad pool of vaccinated adults. There are no increased complications of blood transfusion epidemiologically. That is pretty strong evidence.
Over here, you are truing to extrapolate one case that has a thousand flaws in it to an axiom. Not only is is bad scientific method. It is illogical.