It employed the HDOH Director's seal but nowhere contains her signature. The Director's signature is legally required on every instance the Director's seal is used. Any document that displays the Director's seal without the Director's signature in immediate proximity is ipso facto legally invalid and therefore suitable to no legal purpose, including any claim of where little Barry might have been born.
There are dozens of instances of irregularity concerning Barry's HDOH paperwork. For example, a previous HDOH Director maintained publicly that she'd seen Barry's original Long Form Birth Certificate (LFBC), saying it was "half typed and half handwritten." Anyone who can affirm, after have steeped himself in the voluminous details of this case, that Barry's LFBC contains no alterations that would have inherently made it legally invalid is unmistakably advocating for criminals. I would prefer to discuss only with truth-seekers that could acknowledge when facts don't go their way.
Hawaii Registrar Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D., certainly knew the rules better than any of us when it was his signature that would go out placed next to the Director's seal and not that of Director "Fuddy" on the Mississippi Democratic Party's non-valid Verification. Onaka did not use his own seal, as might have been defensible (despite issuance of this particular Verification being an appropriate function of the Director). But using the Director's seal next to only the registrar's signature made it indefensible and not valid. Just why would such a knowledgeable fellow perpetrate or be party to this deception? Would he have been been coerced? Possibly.
When it can be shown that official documents are not valid, they no longer need be accepted uncontested. A state's apparent "say-so" cannot somehow redeem an official, not-valid document displaying indicia of alteration, amendation or forgery. Furthermore, one cannot supersede Hawaii's own rules for maintaining legal validity of its documents by an external inference, for example, that Registrar Onaka might have been an individual authorized to complete a Verification.
These are grave matters for courts to decide, with tremendously strong preference to "on the merits," not forever deemed to have been finally tossed when complainants are adjudged not to have standing. When new evidence comes to light, for example post-Berg, a previous court's decision could possibly yet be superseded.
Orly Taitz could have been successful in Mississippi if she had known to recognize the non-valid document presented to her, but she was apparently too inexperienced or incompetent. Or perhaps I'm giving her scruples too much credit.
Regarding Barry's Indonesian passport, woodpusher, despite your verbiage, I did not claim Barry acquired that prior to his being of age. His Occidental College and Columbia days show multiple claims and evidence of Barry's having been a foreign student. Can one claim such at those august institutions without showing official documentation? Would the representation of a wealthy foreign donor suffice?
Zoltan: "[Stanley Ann Dunham] continually renewed her US passport until the late 1980s. This can only mean Obama never lost his US citizenship." Wow, just wow. Where did you learn to think? By what valid, official document have you shown he had US citizenship in the 60s, 70s, 80s or 90s? Show us the DNA results to prove Stanley Ann is his mother despite all the fraudulent, non valid documents. Please show conclusive evidence on which any could rely as you do.
If you need help with that, recall Maya and Barry's independent DNA results could prove that one way or another. Similarly and additionally, Malik's can prove BHO, Sr. didn't father Barry. Why do you suppose Barry would spend several millions of bucks in all these legal battles when the truth would [claimedly] be shown for less than several thousand? Why alternatively gin up all these forcibly made-to-appear-consistent pseudo facts that would not easily be discovered by the CNN-MSNBC crowd? The truth behind it all is that the official documentation and their forgers, promulgaters and knowledgeable defenders have been collusively lying to the public and courts! The American public has been forced to live in a swirling fraud for the last twenty or so years, poisoned by a presidentially ineligible foreigner! It takes the Intel Community (IC) and Deep State (DS) players to pull it off, as they have, which is to say "imperfectly."
If Barry's documentation weren't fraudulent forgeries, if all should simply forever bow to the officiality of a HDOH document or two, we wouldn't have had to experience the hoaxed death of CIA asset "Loretta Fuddy," at the hands of Barry and CIA Director Brennan and a large protected cast of IC-supported characters, not to mention foreign military in their hitherto successful election fraud!
Zoltan and woodpusher incessantly take sides for and advocate for a guy and his DS and Agency that repeatedly have put up fraudulent and knowingly non-valid official documents! Why would they have to perpetrate The Fuddy Hoax (see image panel below) that fraudulently redistributed many millions of dollars to corrupt and unworthy recipients? Why is that?
The incessant consistency among this large story, from those in official positions that we've long been trained to trust, is fraud! And "Fraud vitiates everything." Serial fraudsters don't get free, further "bites at the apple" in my book!
